All Activity

In 1962 money I would guess #2 $12, grand.

Good thought…. however $19K isn’t it!

Absolutely CORRECT! I’d love to see a photo of the R3 installation by the Granatellis into that Hawk… but I don’t think such a picture exists! (?)

I'm going to say $19K. New York is an expensive town and I know Studebaker didn't have any money but this is NOT the area to trim the budget. Fingers crossed.

JIM................Message sent

Here’s a way to find an electrical short! 🤣

To me this sounds like an occasional “ground out” due to a frayed wire… a wire that has been chafing against a piece of metal, and is now occasionally grounding out to it… blowing the fuse. A real pain in the - - - to find sometimes! Good luck!

False. R3

Why are electrical problems always rooted behing the dash?!! Any thoughts on why this fuse keeps blowing? I'm thinking about just wireing a whole new set of wires for these four items and bypass the old circuit. But looking at the wireing diagram it appears it runs through the courtesy light and cigar lighter too. Any tips are welcome.

My '72 RQB1878 had a 400cid in it. I found out the hard way because everything I read indicated it was a 350. When I replaced the 400 with a 350 long block I found out the harmonic balancer and flex plate were the external balancers and the new engine vibrated. Once I swapped those 2 componets out with the correct ones, no more vibration. A hard and expensive lesson was learned.

Expenses incurred by Studebaker pertaining to their Avanti display at the 1962 New York International Auto show came to approx …..?….. 1) $9,000…..2) $12,000…..3) $15,000….. or……4) $19,000

The Gran Turismo Hawks Studebaker sent to Bonneville in the fall of 1963 were two- toned to foreshadow the upcoming vinyl roof option on this model….True?

The Gran Turismo Hawk numbered “5”, raced on the Bonneville Salt Flats in the fall of 1963, was powered by an ‘R4’ Avanti engine….True?

Message sent on the wheel covers.

Sleeve accelerator push rod. 513536X1 More commonly called the accelerator boot.

thank you! the link is not working at my computer. could you please send me the part number or name?

This is good information… and might give some other Avanti owner with rocker switch problems the courage to attempt a similar fix!!

Here's what I have.

I'll post a pic of what I have. I'm looking for best offer.

The Granatellis did something different with RS1021 (the engine in 63R-1025). They stroked it to 3 3/4" with the stock 289 bore. Andy G. tried this difference because the thinking at the time was that a longer stroke would give more lower end power gains. This car was a "cheater" or "hot rod" car which Andy used to drag 426 Max Wedge MoPars on Riverside's 1/2 mile drag strip. A So. Cal. engineer bought the car from the Granatellis, lost his job, moved to Nor. Cal. where my father and uncle bought the car in '69 or '70. I drove it to high school in the middle and later '90s. Correct though, that ALL other 299s were made by going 0.06" additional bore. Andy knew that even the stroker engine would be fine if it was ever challenged, so long as the stewards only did a simple volume check. It would have failed had they popped the heads off and actually measured the bore for that 0.06" increase.

The source I quoted from was mentioned in the ‘Avanti survey’ trivia question. This was explained in the ‘Avanti second’ trivia question. I’m not exactly sure what other proof you’re looking for….. perhaps you could check with the ad agency itself, although I’m not really sure if they’re still in business. Feel free to post a few trivia questions of your own….. I started the ball rolling with this trivia section back in 2014, however I always hoped that I wouldn’t be the only person to post questions….Who knows…you may end up with a troll of your very own!!

I found, that when anyone does any post about any supposed fact, there will ALWAYS be individuals who check their understanding of the post and compare it to what information that they have. Since you aren't willing to supply your proof as Regnalbob is requesting, then that lack of action places your responses in question. You appear to have a lot of time on your hands and spend a lot of it posting trivia stuff on this forum which is fine. But it also puts you in the face of others and since it is a public forum, then the "others" have the right to verify your claims. Once you complain about being asked by anyone to prove it and you deny that request, then you open up the door for responses like this. Wouldn't that be a more productive way of spending your spare time?

Jim, I am interested in the wire wheel covers. Jeff

"Belzona"! That was my ex-wife's name😬

GuyByMy overhead switchs were not functioning at all. New ones are were not currently available so I decided to open up the switches and see if I could recondition them. They are very simple inside, mechanically nothing wrong, the lube they used on the inside had turned into a waxy substance that prevented the contacts from passing electricity. Degreased and cleaned contacts checked continuity from spade to contact and spade to spade then reassembled. Repainted rockers to freashen up the look, almost like new.