Tim G Posted May 15, 2021 Report Share Posted May 15, 2021 (edited) Hi Folks, When I found my Avanti a couple of years ago I also ended up with this block and need help identifying and valuing it. It appears to never have been assembled and is well preserved. The return address on the shipping label is South Bend so I assume it is NOS or remanufactured but not really sure. I do not have a use for it and would like to find it a new home so it doesn't go do waste. It is block and pistons only, not crank, rods, etc. If anyone can provide information I'd really appreciate it! Edited May 15, 2021 by Tim G Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwight FitzSimons Posted May 15, 2021 Report Share Posted May 15, 2021 (edited) There is a casting date code at the very back, near the distributor, that reads: "10 1 R". That translates to October 1, 1962. So, it is an early 1963 block. That would make it a full flow block, a good thing. Being just a bare block (& pistons) it could be used to build a 259, 289, R1, or R2. That is, there is no difference in the bare block (and bore) among these engines. Another question is what pistons are they? 259s and 289's use different pistons and are not interchangeable. They are flat top, which could indicate that they are R1/R2. As to value, I don't know, but it is desirable and rare these days. -Dwight Edited May 15, 2021 by Dwight FitzSimons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfg Posted May 16, 2021 Report Share Posted May 16, 2021 (edited) Yep, that's a 'goodie' all right!....If you get no takers for that NOS block with fitted pistons, why not give Dave Thibeault a call?.....I don't think Dave frequents this forum very often so he probably wont see this....however, he's one of the larger Avanti parts vendors, and would no doubt be interested! Tel# 978-897-3158 PS.....I'd guess it's a 259CI. Edited May 16, 2021 by mfg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim G Posted May 18, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 Thanks for the info guys. I have someone locally offering $250. That's fair, right? Shipping does not seem cost effective and like I said I just want to see this get used instead of sitting around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
64studeavanti Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 IMHO, it is easily worth twice the offer. After all, just a new set of pistons and rings cost more than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
64studeavanti Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 Where are you located? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwight FitzSimons Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 I would second 64studeavanti's assessment of the block's value. But, as you know, shipping is a big issue. -Dwight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avanti83 Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 21 hours ago, Tim G said: Thanks for the info guys. I have someone locally offering $250. That's fair, right? Shipping does not seem cost effective and like I said I just want to see this get used instead of sitting around. I have no idea about the value but it's currently worth $250 as that's the offer. Bottom line is you can move it on or wait for a better offer which my allow you keep stumbling over it for the next 10 years or more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim G Posted May 18, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 5 minutes ago, Avanti83 said: I have no idea about the value but it's currently worth $250 as that's the offer. Bottom line is you can move it on or wait for a better offer which my allow you keep stumbling over it for the next 10 years or more. It's in storage at my dad's house so nobody is stumbling over it:) I was just looking for general advice on the value. I'm not greedy, but didn't want to be taken advantage of in the absence of knowledge on the topic. I do understand your point but there are several folks interested and I don't like saying "what'll you give me for it?". I was thinking $300-$500 (picking numbers out of thin air) so $250 is close but wanted to double-check. Thanks for the help everyone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim G Posted May 18, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 11 hours ago, 64studeavanti said: Where are you located? I'm just outside St Paul, MN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim G Posted May 18, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 11 hours ago, 64studeavanti said: IMHO, it is easily worth twice the offer. After all, just a new set of pistons and rings cost more than that. Thanks for the input! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackardV8 Posted May 22, 2021 Report Share Posted May 22, 2021 On 5/18/2021 at 4:48 AM, 64studeavanti said: IMHO, it is easily worth twice the offer. After all, just a new set of pistons and rings cost more than that. Yes, No, Maybe. How it's been stored and in the humidity of MN, makes estimating worth a real crapshoot. Pulling a number out of the etheric without an examination assumes too much. FWIW, I was given a similar NOS Packard 320" fitted block and pistons which was from CA and was still usable as was. A customer sent us a fitted Champion block which had been stored in Alabama and nothing in it was usable. The rings had rusted to the cylinders and corroded into the pistons. The block had to be bored .060" over to clean up the rust pits. Suggestion; wipe down a cylinder with an oily rag, knock one piston out and show the prospective purchaser the condition of the cylinder, rings and pistons. jack vines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Stauffer Posted July 25, 2021 Report Share Posted July 25, 2021 I have a 1963 supercharged Avanti with what a believe to be a replacement engine. It has the same stamped numbers as the block that Tim G is writing about (see photo attached to this post). Is it possible to confirm that this is a Studebaker block? The 3.6" bore on Tim G.'s block conforms to what I read for specifications of the original 289 R-2 engine. Were the originally installed engines stamped with unique serial number? If so, where would I locate it? If indeed mine is a replacement, would it have a unique serial number and if so where? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studegary Posted July 25, 2021 Report Share Posted July 25, 2021 29 minutes ago, Rick Stauffer said: I have a 1963 supercharged Avanti with what a believe to be a replacement engine. It has the same stamped numbers as the block that Tim G is writing about (see photo attached to this post). Is it possible to confirm that this is a Studebaker block? The 3.6" bore on Tim G.'s block conforms to what I read for specifications of the original 289 R-2 engine. Were the originally installed engines stamped with unique serial number? If so, where would I locate it? If indeed mine is a replacement, would it have a unique serial number and if so where? . You are showing a cast in number. The engine Serial Number is stamped into the block (top, left, front). For the 1963 model year, engine numbers were unique to that particular engine. For the 1964 model year, all engines, of a type, that were made on the same day have the same Engine Number. Provide your stamped Engine Number and we can tell you more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Stauffer Posted September 27, 2021 Report Share Posted September 27, 2021 Thanks for the response, I was unable to see an engine number on the top of the block left front (see attached photos). Any thoughts on where else to look? Much obliged, Rick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
studegary Posted September 27, 2021 Report Share Posted September 27, 2021 It looks like a replacement block that was not stamped at installation, as it should have been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skip Lackie Posted October 9, 2021 Report Share Posted October 9, 2021 Agree with Gary. The problem you have is that it could be either a 259 or a 289, and could also be a standard engine or an R1. The factory assumed that the buyer would know what he ordered, and did not include any stampings on replacement engines to indicate what was inside. The only way to know for sure would be to measure the stroke and/or look at the piston tops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Stauffer Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 Thanks for the responses above. From those, I assume the cast in number at the right corner of the block isn't helpful. Given that this mystery motor is married with the supercharger and a 4-speed and that the car was at one time used for racing, is there any chance that it could be an R-3? Needless to say, I appreciate your thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
64studeavanti Posted October 12, 2021 Report Share Posted October 12, 2021 R3 would have reliefs cut into the block for the valves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Stauffer Posted October 18, 2021 Report Share Posted October 18, 2021 Would that be visible without removing the cylinder heads? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
64studeavanti Posted October 19, 2021 Report Share Posted October 19, 2021 If it is R3, the casting number on the large port heads is 1555479. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Stauffer Posted November 5, 2021 Report Share Posted November 5, 2021 Again thanks for the information and your patience in this dialog. Best I can see is a casting number 1557582 (see attached)--would that suggest a 289 block? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
64studeavanti Posted November 5, 2021 Report Share Posted November 5, 2021 The 582 heads were used on R2 engines as well as some trucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Stauffer Posted November 6, 2021 Report Share Posted November 6, 2021 I really appreciate your responses. Very helpful. R Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now