mfg Posted January 3 Report Posted January 3 Jay Leno bought a ‘56 Packard Caribbean convertible last year just like the one I owned several years ago… One of only fifteen black and white examples… !
mfg Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 Sure would have been interesting if the 400+ cubic inch Packard V8 was kept in production and ended up under the hood of the Avanti!!
Desert Driver Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 On 1/15/2025 at 9:30 AM, mfg said: Sure would have been interesting if the 400+ cubic inch Packard V8 was kept in production and ended up under the hood of the Avanti!! With that beast under the hood, you wouldn't need to turn on the heater to keep warm during a midwest winter! Store it in the summer.
64studeavanti Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 400+ cu in engine? I thought the largest Packard production engine was 374 cu in.
mfg Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 2 hours ago, 64studeavanti said: 400+ cu in engine? I thought the largest Packard production engine was 374 cu in. It was…. However, with it’s exceptionally wide cylinder bore spacing… it’s said the Packard V8 block had a potential for well over 400 CI.
mfg Posted Tuesday at 05:23 AM Report Posted Tuesday at 05:23 AM During a HRM Engine Masters Challenge a few years ago, a 374 CI Packard V8, normally aspirated, achieved 449 horsepower and 444 lbs. ft. of torque …. And to think Studebaker had this big block engine, for a time, at their disposal!!
Footer Posted Tuesday at 02:08 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 02:08 PM Would it have fit in the Avanti engine bay?
mfg Posted Tuesday at 04:22 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 04:22 PM 2 hours ago, Footer said: Would it have fit in the Avanti engine bay? Good question…..Width wise no problem…. Length wise I’m not so sure!
Dwight FitzSimons Posted Tuesday at 06:46 PM Report Posted Tuesday at 06:46 PM On 1/18/2025 at 8:01 AM, 64studeavanti said: 400+ cu in engine? I thought the largest Packard production engine was 374 cu in. The senior 1956 Packards came standard with a 374 engine. But, years ago, one of the Studebaker specialists (can't remember their name) in PA bored one out to 409 C.I. That would produce some torque! --Dwight
mfg Posted yesterday at 06:09 PM Report Posted yesterday at 06:09 PM I have a 1957 HRM with an article about enlarging the Packard V8…. Starting with a ‘56 Golden Hawk equipped with the Packard 352, a California mechanic bored & stroked it to 414 CI… Took it to Bonneville and ran 141 MPH with a “ malfunctioning distributor” !!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now