During a HRM Engine Masters Challenge a few years ago, a 374 CI Packard V8, normally aspirated, achieved 449 horsepower and 444 lbs. ft. of torque …. And to think Studebaker had this big block engine, for a time, at their disposal!!
These days a Studebaker Avanti’s original straight thru exhaust system would probably be considered quiet compared to the racket some of the current hi-po cars (and motorcycles) make!!
Good question!… I’d guess they are… and I’d say they could be considered part of the “engine oiling system”
Not really what I’m looking for though!
HINT…. Let’s add some oil!!!!
Thank you Murph…. Seeing factual documentation is much fairer to the accused than accepting the word of a man known to be a ‘loose cannon’, seldom backing up his comments.
With you on the oil filter… not sure on air filter, as I see different part numbers…
Actually though, I was looking for two other items…. any other thoughts?
I’m a union guy… however, it’s difficult to understand why the South Bend local would be pushing so hard for increased benefits, when it had to be SO clear at that time that Studebaker Corporation was on such thin ice!
Can anyone name two components of the engine oiling system in common and interchangeable between the 1964 Studebaker ‘Skybolt Six’, and the ‘64 Studebaker Avanti R4 engines ?
This painting looks very similar to the blue convertible ‘C/K’ type custom that was on display at the SDC International meet at Warwick, Rhode Island a few years ago.
I have trouble understanding the difference between “slickness” and the issue of “wiping action”…
In other words, if a surface is slick, shouldn’t that resolve the wiping action friction situation?