All Activity
- Past hour
-
It is F'n-A expensive for what you get, though if you wanted some reflective properties in that area, this could work. https://culturehustle.com/products/mirror
- Yesterday
-
That’s what we’ve heard…However, I would not call that the reason Checker Motors was beneficial in the startup of Avanti Motors. Other thought on this brain twister??
-
No…the owner of Checker refused and told Nate Altman the Avanti was ugly. That from the builder of such homely cars such as Checker.
-
Mike Salamunovich was the owner of Studependous !!!
-
So Jim Bergener's race car was not called Studependous and no HRM article exists with various photos of his Lark.
-
TRANSISTORIZED IGNITION COMPONENTS - SOLD
-
Two different race Larks…. Two different owners…..Two similar engines….. I’m confused… however that is nothing new! I guess the answer to this trivia question is ‘Open To Interpretation’ !!
-
This is great information. Thank you to all who contributed. It does now appear that B300 was most probably originally an R4 engine.
-
Why was Checker Cab Company a ‘lifesaver’ for the fledgling Avanti Motor Company in 1965?
-
It is interesting and I'd like to believe it was an intentional Loewy decision for the benefit of rear seat passengers. But, there's no one left to ask.
-
Checker Cab - and they knew ugly!
-
Here is the link to the Hot Rod Magazine article about Mike Salamunovich and the Studependous. You can post the article or provide a link to the HRM article about Jim Bergener and the Studependous. https://www.hotrod.com/features/there-is-nothing-like-a-studebaker-december-1973-982-608-110-1
-
Let's start the week with an easy one........ What automobile manufacturer said the Avanti II was too ugly and declined Nate Altman’s proposal to build them for Avanti Motors?
-
Those would be the ones. For years, conjecture was that it was designed that way so rear seat passengers could have a less obstructed forward view. I don't know if that was the reason, or not.
-
This past week I test drove an Avanti I am interested in. The first thing I noticed was the high effort required during very low speed tight turns. It felt like almost zero assist in tight maneuvers. Like a manual steer car. Once you got rolling the car steered well. This cars past service history lists a p/s valve replacement. In searching the forum here, I see several discussions on p/s issues. I am trying to understand the nature of these cars. I have zero experience driving one until now. I have had GM cars of the 80's era, the same year as this Avanti. The p/s effort is minimal in the conditions described. Am I just accustomed to the GM level of assist? How much effort does a proper functioning Avanti p/s system require in low to no motion conditions?
-
Thanks MFG.... I still will be draining the tank.. Gun...The lines seem uptight but I will be looking all things over... Thanks Guys... I'm just thrilled She started and ran so well.
-
Yes.. that must have been an interesting visit! Once again, the HRM article was very detailed, with various photos of Bergener’s Lark, including an overhead shot of the R4 engine which had the standard Stude Avanti side mounted Paxton supercharger, and a custom ‘Y’ that split the boost into the two AFB carburetors…I was thinking that’s how those three pistons got cracked!
-
I can’t say that I saw an article on Berner’s car. It would have to have been late 60’s to early 70’s. I was at his place around that time frame looking at a white 63 R2 GT that he said was the test car for the first full pkg GT. I think tha car is up in Washington now and owned by the Bells. I think he was dismantling his race car at that time
-
Thanks Nelson… I was pretty sure we were speaking of two different Larks! Did you ever see the HRM article on Bergener’s car?
-
Hopefully this 1982 info fills in some gaps concerning B300… Rosters can be considerable work… For a time I was roster keeper for the President Speedster model… Starting with a prior roster that had about 185 cars in it, the Speedster roster had about 350 examples before I moved on!
