Jump to content

r1lark

AOAI Forum Members
  • Posts

    1,000
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by r1lark

  1. Is there a Studebaker Sales Letter that announces this to the Dealers? It's one thing to tell the AMA that the R3 will be an option (to make 'back door' hand-built engines legal for various forms of racing}. But if no official Studebaker notification was provided to the Dealers informing them of the option, cost, ordering info, etc how could that be a true option? I don't know, maybe more knowledgeable folks can carry on this debate. :) 

  2. True, there were a handful of Red F-body Commanders built with R2 packages, and they had JTSH-prefixed engine numbers. Some of these were at Bonneville during the '63 speed runs. One was the December ’63 Motor Trend road test car. 

  3. 10 hours ago, mfg said:

    Paula Murphy drove......?..... MPH faster in a Studebaker Avanti than in a Studebaker GT Hawk at Bonneville in 1963.

    1) Seven.......2) Ten.....3) Twelve.....or....4) Fourteen

    I believe the speeds were 154 for the GT, and 161 for the Avanti, so I'll say #1 -- Seven. 

    Here is a cool pic of Paula in the #4 GT Hawk:

     

    paulamurphybonne5.jpg

  4. On 12/18/2021 at 4:15 PM, bob caser said:

    Spectacular photo, thank you for posting it. I like the turquoise hue  on the wall and support. As you know I have something turquoise from your family Studebaker dealership that I have kept almost a long as this photograph has been around.

    Bob Caser

    Thanks Bob!

  5. Ed, here are the two photos that I mentioned. Since my family's dealership was on Long Island, this may very well be the New York City Technical Training Center. I know that this is not the service area of the dealership. My grandfather, although he was the President of the company, preferred to stay in the background and run the shop, so he went to a lot of the training. My father and uncle handled the sales. Note the DKW Junior in the background, many Studebaker dealers sold DKWs as part of the Mercedes-Benz sales agreement, so possibly there was training on the DKWs also. And that engine stand is super heavy duty! Comments welcome.

    img622 jpeg.jpg

    img620 jpeg.jpg

  6. Strictly guesstimating here............List price for a '64 Avanti (the only year I could quickly access in my bookshelf) was a little over $4000. Assuming this was a R1 with 3 speed manual and no options. So let's guess $4750 per Avanti with Powershift, power steering, etc. Guessing again (with absolutely nothing to base this on :)) that Studebaker's cost was 85% of the sticker price, that's $4037 per car, or $20,187. Add about $2000 for the chassis, comes up to a little over $22K. So, I'll say #1,  $21,975.50...................again, total guesswork.

    On this subject Ed, do you know where the other four regional training centers were? I have what I think are some pictures from one of the training centers, that were taken probably by my grandfather. 

  7. 4 hours ago, paul shuffleburg said:

    It seems like it would be easier to put a .25¢ pilot bushing in while the engine is being built instead of

    waiting to see if is is going to have a 3 or 4 speed tranny.

    For what it's worth, the Parts Manual says that service crankshafts for '63 and '64 include the pilot bushing. So maybe all of the crankshafts had pilot bushings installed in them like Paul Shuffleburg is saying. 

  8. Seems like a tricky one here Ed. :)  The pulleys were different between the R2 and R3. The alternators themselves, except for the pulleys, appear to be the same. But since the pulleys were different, that means the alternator assembly (alternator and pulley) were different, so I'll say FALSE. 

×
×
  • Create New...