murph the surf Posted November 16, 2017 Report Posted November 16, 2017 (edited) While we're talking Indy 500's and Studebaker pacing the '62 race with a Lark Daytona convertible........is the following statement true or false? : while unheard of for a car manufacturer to pace Indy for two consecutive years, a Studebaker Avanti was initially selected to be the pace car for the 1963 Indianapolis 500. Edited November 16, 2017 by murph the surf
murph the surf Posted November 16, 2017 Author Report Posted November 16, 2017 (edited) Correct-the Studebaker Avanti was selected to be the Pace Car for the 1962 Indy,however,the car was not ready on time,and the Lark Daytona ended up as the '62 Pace Car.The Studebaker Avanti became the "honorary" pace car for that race. Edited November 16, 2017 by murph the surf
Gunslinger Posted November 16, 2017 Report Posted November 16, 2017 If you read Bob Palma's article in last month's issue of Hemmings Classic Cars you'll find out that the Lark was always supposed to be the pace car...documents and the time factor involved prove it. Yes...the Avanti was the honorary pace car but it's a myth it was to be the official pace car and the Lark was a last minute substitution. The Lark was chosen months before the Avanti was even announced to the public...it was still in secret development.
murph the surf Posted November 16, 2017 Author Report Posted November 16, 2017 (edited) Hmmm-never saw that article.Just can't imagine that Bill Dredge and Studebaker's PR Department would go to all those lengths to promote a LARK to be an Indy Pace Car-especially with their halo car,the Avanti, well under development and thought to be market ready just before the race . Mr Egbert wanted to have the Avanti 'to market" within one year of Board approval,and knew no time constraints.This would have been approximately April of 1962,and with the 1962 Indy 500 being held on May 30,1962,I would assume that they thought the car would have been ready for the event.I may be wrong,but logic tells me an Indy race would have been just the event to showcase their new performance car,and the Lark was indeed a second choice-but I'll certainly read the article.Thanks,Gunslinger. Edited November 16, 2017 by murph the surf
studegary Posted November 16, 2017 Report Posted November 16, 2017 My understanding agrees with Gunslinger and Bob P. Keep in mind that an open car was desired for the Pace Car at that time.
r1lark Posted November 16, 2017 Report Posted November 16, 2017 1 hour ago, studegary said: Keep in mind that an open car was desired for the Pace Car at that time. Excellent point Gary.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now