Avanti’s Second!

[regnalbob]

On 7/9/2025 at 1:22 PM, mfg said:

In the 1966 survey mentioned in the prior post, purchasers of new Studebaker Avantis whom had a ‘2nd’ vehicle owned a …..?……

1) Studebaker…..2) Ford……3) GM…..or…..4) Foreign make

The answer to the question is all of the above. 

Read the question.

Odd that mfg could not figure that out.

[mfg]

2 hours ago, Mark63Avanti said:

According to Regnalbob's list, for 22 Avanti owners it was their second Avanti!

That’s pretty cool Mark!

[mfg]

38 minutes ago, regnalbob said:

The answer to the question is all of the above. 

Read the question.

Odd that mfg could not figure that out.

Once again, you are misinterpreting the INTENT of the question… Seems like all other responders understood… and then came Regnalbob!!

I have an idea… how about you posting a few trivia questions of your own instead of continually trolling me?

Wouldn’t that be a more productive way of spending your spare time?

[ronmanfredi]

On 7/14/2025 at 11:56 AM, mfg said:

Once again, you are misinterpreting the INTENT of the question… Seems like all other responders understood… and then came Regnalbob!!

I have an idea… how about you posting a few trivia questions of your own instead of continually trolling me?

Wouldn’t that be a more productive way of spending your spare time?

I found, that when anyone does any post about any supposed fact, there will ALWAYS be individuals who check their understanding of the post and compare it to what information that they have.  Since you aren't willing to supply your proof as Regnalbob is requesting, then that lack of action places your responses in question.  You appear to have a lot of time on your hands and spend a lot of it posting trivia stuff on this forum which is fine.  But it also puts you in the face of others and since it is a public forum, then the "others" have the right to verify your claims. Once you complain about being asked by anyone to prove it and you deny that request, then you open up the door for responses like this. Wouldn't that be a more productive way of spending your spare time? 

[mfg]

57 minutes ago, ronmanfredi said:

I found, that when anyone does any post about any supposed fact, there will ALWAYS be individuals who check their understanding of the post and compare it to what information that they have.  Since you aren't willing to supply your proof as Regnalbob is requesting, then that lack of action places your responses in question.  You appear to have a lot of time on your hands and spend a lot of it posting trivia stuff on this forum which is fine.  But it also puts you in the face of others and since it is a public forum, then the "others" have the right to verify your claims. Once you complain about being asked by anyone to prove it and you deny that request, then you open up the door for responses like this. Wouldn't that be a more productive way of spending your spare time? 

The source I quoted from was mentioned in the ‘Avanti survey’ trivia question. This was explained in the ‘Avanti second’ trivia question.
I’m not exactly sure what other proof you’re looking for….. perhaps you could check with the ad agency itself, although I’m not really sure if they’re still in business.

Feel free to post a few trivia questions of your own….. I started the ball rolling with this trivia section back in 2014, however I always hoped that I wouldn’t be the only person to post questions….Who knows…you may end up with a troll of your very own!!