Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What was the technical reason Studebaker chose to employ a 'dry type' engine air filltration system on their R2-R3 Avantis, as opposed to the 'wet' type?

Posted

Perhaps that the suction of the supercharger would pull droplets of oil through the blower and into the engine.  Besides, oil-bath air cleaners were obsolete by the early 1960s anyway. Also, oil-bath air cleaners were bulky and would have taken up too much room.

--Dwight

Posted
1 hour ago, mfg said:

What was the technical reason Studebaker chose to employ a 'dry type' engine air filltration system on their R2-R3 Avantis, as opposed to the 'wet' type?

An oil bath air filter did not fit the "hi performance image" of the Avanti either!

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Dwight FitzSimons said:

Perhaps that the suction of the supercharger would pull droplets of oil through the blower and into the engine.  Besides, oil-bath air cleaners were obsolete by the early 1960s anyway. Also, oil-bath air cleaners were bulky and would have taken up too much room.

--Dwight

Dwight, your first sentence summed it up!.....Studebaker learned this with their supercharged Golden Hawks!

 

Posted
2 hours ago, r1lark said:

An oil bath air filter did not fit the "hi performance image" of the Avanti either!

 

That's true also!

Posted

What’s old is new again…K&N air filters are essentially modern oil bath filters but many refuse to use them as they can supposedly allow debris flow through.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...