Jump to content

r1lark

AOAI Forum Members
  • Posts

    1,017
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by r1lark

  1. Ed, first.......congrats on your favorite team's win last night. :D

    The reason I didn't answer this is that your description of the shift confused me. In my experience, if the trans pressures are too high the shift will be late and hard. If the pressure is too low, the shift will be early and feel like the tranny is 'slipping' or 'sliding' into the next gear (maybe what you mean by spongy?)

    So, based on this, a delayed (ie, late, shifting at a high rpm) shift and a spongy shift don't seem to go together. So I decided to see what others would answer. :)

  2. Well, I was too lazy to run the calculations but since no one else answered..................

    Taking into account the tensile modulus of elasticity of FRP, the frame rail design and gage, the x-member, etc, a quickie estimate is around 4000 ft-lbs/deg of twist. So I'll say the answer is 3) 3800 - 4200.

  3. Here is the quote from one of his obituaries that I based my second answer on:

    "I've concluded that the car is cosmic," Kellogg told Associated Press in 2000. "It has some sort of personality or spirit that keeps finding people to take it over and stroke it and keep it going."

    So, he was specifically talking about the AVX as opposed to all the various generations of the Avanti line?

  4. 10 hours ago, mfg said:

    No one has a 1983 Avanti Motors option sheet?

    I don't, but the '79 options sheet listed a trunk mount CB for $350. But it doesn't show up on the '85 brochure options list.

    I'm going to say that Stephen Blake eliminated the CB option so will say FALSE.

  5. Because it was, like, out of this world man! :)

    Seriously, was it because supposedly Raymond wanted the shape of the wheel openings to match the reentry curve of a rocket (or something like that)?

    I'm really reaching on this one..........

  6. I think the '82s still used the Studebaker frame. And I know that the Avanti and Hawk traction bars were the same (the Lark for some reason was the odd one out). Now whether the traction bars were still used on an '82 I don't know for sure.......but I think maybe they were. So I will take the opposite tack from Charlie and say "TRUE". :)

  7. FALSE!  Same part number -- if something works, keep using it. :P

    Whoops, just realized that you said 1984 instead of 1964. Well, a '39 Commander and '64 Avanti was the same part number so I will stick with FALSE......hoping the Altmans continued using that same boot.

×
×
  • Create New...