Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The highest (lowest numerically) rear axle ratio offered by Studebaker for R3 Avanti models was 2.79......True?

Posted
30 minutes ago, lschuc said:

False....  it was 3:07

 

 

Sorry Lew, according to printed Studebaker info, 307 wasn't the highest ratio available for the R3's.

Posted

However, Lew's "false" is the CORRECT answer to this question!.....Now, does anyone have an idea of what really was the highest rear axle ratio available with the R3 engine option?

Posted

Yes, FALSE, the Highest ratio, 3.07:1 (lowest numerically) is the correct answer, as MFG says, above.

The LOWEST ratio (Highest numerically) ratio available for an R3 was 4:55.    The first of 9 production R3 models came from the factory with a 4.55:1 rear axle ratio.  It was a drag race from stoplight to stoplight! :)

Posted

2.87 is the highest ratio available. none were ordered.

Posted

To be clear, although Lew's FALSE response was correct, according to a letter from Studebaker Corp dated 1/8/63, ALL the above ratio replys are INCORRECT!

Any more thoughts on what the highest available Avanti R3 axle ratio was?

Posted

ANSWER... According to a letter from Studebaker dated  1/8/63, axle ratios offered with the R3 'engine package' ranged from a high of 2.53 to a low of 5.38 (WOW! talk about a stump-puller!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...