Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The usual criticism of using urethane basecoat/clearcoat exterior paint on 'stock' Studebaker Avanti's (and pre-'84 Avanti ll's),  when officially judged at major auto show concours, is that the paint job is.......?........

 

1)Too shiny.......2) Too smooth.......3) Not original factory spec.....or.....4) Slightly off color

Posted

I think that it is a combination of 1, 3 and 5) does not give the appearance of lacquer alone with a top coat that is practically transparent.  

Posted

I'm gonna say "too shiny".

As an antique car guy, the modern urethane paint colors have a sparkle that no "vintage" paint possessed.

Posted

Lew and Gary are likely correct in saying any of the above choices could be 'called out' by field judges, however I believe 63R1388 has 'nailed' the criticism that is mentioned most often.....#1.Too shiny!

(Frankly, I'd like  any of my Studes to be called 'Too shiny'........but, in high end 'stock' judging, original is original!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...