Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The GM frames used under the '87-'91 Avantis were less susceptible to the corrosive effects of road salt than the Studebaker type frames used on earlier Avantis......True?

Edited by mfg
Posted

The way that the question is worded, I will say false. 

One difference is that the '87 - '91 cars did not have torque boxes (hog troughs) that were even more prone to rust than the frames.  

Posted
12 hours ago, studegary said:

The way that the question is worded, I will say false. 

One difference is that the '87 - '91 cars did not have torque boxes (hog troughs) that were even more prone to rust than the frames.  

False is CORRECT....We know of one complete frame that needed replacing under an '88 Avanti convertible  (Chicago area car driven in winter)

Posted
3 hours ago, mfg said:

False is CORRECT....We know of one complete frame that needed replacing under an '88 Avanti convertible  (Chicago area car driven in winter)

I know of a 1987 coupe that the frame is so rusted that the Avanti is unsafe to drive.  That car was also in regular use in the Midwest.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...