mfg Posted September 8, 2017 Report Posted September 8, 2017 (edited) The GM frames used under the '87-'91 Avantis were less susceptible to the corrosive effects of road salt than the Studebaker type frames used on earlier Avantis......True? Edited September 8, 2017 by mfg
studegary Posted September 8, 2017 Report Posted September 8, 2017 The way that the question is worded, I will say false. One difference is that the '87 - '91 cars did not have torque boxes (hog troughs) that were even more prone to rust than the frames.
mfg Posted September 9, 2017 Author Report Posted September 9, 2017 12 hours ago, studegary said: The way that the question is worded, I will say false. One difference is that the '87 - '91 cars did not have torque boxes (hog troughs) that were even more prone to rust than the frames. False is CORRECT....We know of one complete frame that needed replacing under an '88 Avanti convertible (Chicago area car driven in winter)
studegary Posted September 9, 2017 Report Posted September 9, 2017 3 hours ago, mfg said: False is CORRECT....We know of one complete frame that needed replacing under an '88 Avanti convertible (Chicago area car driven in winter) I know of a 1987 coupe that the frame is so rusted that the Avanti is unsafe to drive. That car was also in regular use in the Midwest.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now