Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

R3 & R4 lifters were ____?_____ lighter than a stock R1/R2 lifter?

1) 0 oz.........2) 0.25 oz..........3) 1.2 oz...........4) 2.0 oz

Edited by r1lark
  • r1lark changed the title to Light in the Lifters?
Posted

Could be wrong, but I've never heard that R3-R4 lifters were lightened by the Granatellis....So I'll say #1,  0 ozs.:huh:

Posted
On 2/6/2022 at 7:33 AM, mfg said:

Could be wrong, but I've never heard that R3-R4 lifters were lightened by the Granatellis....So I'll say #1,  0 ozs.:huh:

Sorry Ed, that's not the answer. According to Paxton Service Bulletins posted on Bob Johnstone's site www.studebaker-info.org, the R3/R4 lifters "........are .25 oz. lighter than the stock lifter."

Posted
8 hours ago, r1lark said:

Sorry Ed, that's not the answer. According to Paxton Service Bulletins posted on Bob Johnstone's site www.studebaker-info.org, the R3/R4 lifters "........are .25 oz. lighter than the stock lifter."

That's interesting!...I remember how very thick the valve lifter wall was in the early 232 CI Stude V8....and how Studebaker bored out most of that thick lifter wall when they improved the engine in 1955 (259 CI)....Hard to believe Paxton could get another 1/4 ounce of material out of it!!:o

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...