mfg Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago It had to be a difficult time for Studebaker Corporation during the summer of 1963…. The idea of calling unsold Avanti automobiles, originally built and considered 1963 models 1964’s after a certain date, seems highly unusual to me!…. More on this oddity in the AVANTI TRIVIA section.
ronmanfredi Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, mfg said: It had to be a difficult time for Studebaker Corporation during the summer of 1963…. The idea of calling unsold Avanti automobiles, originally built and considered 1963 models 1964’s after a certain date, seems highly unusual to me!…. More on this oddity in the AVANTI TRIVIA section. I don't know why. Back in the day, a lot of manufacturers were doing this in the early fall. Studebaker didn't really have new models each year like the big 3 did, they made ongoing running changes, so a "fall-winter" change over to the next year made sense even if the car didn't change.
mfg Posted 1 hour ago Author Report Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, ronmanfredi said: I don't know why. Back in the day, a lot of manufacturers were doing this in the early fall. Studebaker didn't really have new models each year like the big 3 did, they made ongoing running changes, so a "fall-winter" change over to the next year made sense even if the car didn't change. Exactly!…. But I’d say their strategy probably didn’t convince many perspective buyers that a car that was a ‘63 last week is now, on a certain date, a ‘64!…..As we know, Studebaker’s Automotive Division was really ‘on the rocks’ by then.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now