Jump to content

gwood7

AOAI Forum Members
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by gwood7

  1. Yes it is removable and as Gene said the welds in #8 are quite amazing.  I would guess it was done by someone or a shop near Paxton that did welding for the aerospace industry.  Mfg: would you please give a reference for the ad stating it was bolted in?  I have not seen that ad.

  2. Here is my count. Cabin glass=8, Instrument faces=8, Head light covers=2, Radio face=1, Fuel sediment bowl=1, giving a total of these items of 20. Then the overhead switch panel cover is clear but it is plastic. The standard mirrors (inside rear view and vanity) I didn't really consider as "see through" but Ron could argue that point..

  3. I agree, if you zoom in and stop the videos, the lenses are absent on #9 but the bezels are there. It seems we need an expert like Richard Bennett or John Hora to chime in here. This must have been to relieve pressure on the back glass. Due Cento is interesting in this respect as some pictures show no bezels nor lenses, and others show bezels and what looks like a dark blanked out lens. Seems there have been some opinions posted somewhere about why those pictures look to have dark lenses.

  4. The "I believe" in my answer was because I was too lazy to go look at my car #5085 which I have owned for ~38 years. I am very certain this car has its original paint, right down to the "crayon" number under the front of the hood. I just went out and checked and the inner air scoop is body color (Avanti red).

    To extent the conversation to 1963, a knowledgeable collector I know believes that early 63 Avantis are blacked-out in the air scoop. Interesting is that the Studebaker Museum has recently listed some neat Bonneville pictures for sale. In one of these (link below) it is obvious that 1007 (the #9 Bonneville car) has that area painted body color (at least for Bonneville).

    . http://studebakerarchives.photoshelter.com/image?&_bqG=4&_bqH=eJzzMPPPLjc1zU0ONA1PKXAL8yj3Dw0sj0zOjne0srAyNDAAYSDpGe8S7GzrlJ.Xl1qWmZOTqgYWiHf0c7EtAbJDg12D4j1dbENBil1NKtz0zPIsggJ81eIdnUNsi1MTi5IzAOxZIK4-&GI_ID=

  5. I will now wager 5. It seems the salt is covering the 2 lower bolts in the color pictures. But there is a B/W pic that shows 2 more visible bolts at the bottom. I guess Richard Bennett isn't following this question, and if this is wrong the answer would then be 7, and there are 2 bolts not seen in any picture.

×
×
  • Create New...