mfg Posted September 16, 2014 Report Share Posted September 16, 2014 What major difference is found in the 1963 Chevrolet Corvette body in comparison to the 1963 Studebaker Avanti body? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dapy Posted September 16, 2014 Report Share Posted September 16, 2014 Shape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunslinger Posted September 16, 2014 Report Share Posted September 16, 2014 The Avanti body is one piece after assembly...the Corvette's isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfg Posted September 16, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2014 Not exactly what we're looking for here...I should re-phrase question to "difference in body structure"....? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warren55 Posted September 16, 2014 Report Share Posted September 16, 2014 A built in roll bar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfg Posted September 17, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2014 A built in roll bar? That's really not the 'structural difference' (Although I agree with you that only the Avanti had the roll bar) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GAWen Posted September 17, 2014 Report Share Posted September 17, 2014 Several years ago I took RQB 1600 to a Corvette Specialty shop for body work. They refused to do the work, saying they were not familiar with the Avanti body due to the fiberglass being made-up differently and being of a thicker material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dapy Posted September 17, 2014 Report Share Posted September 17, 2014 Thicker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlennW Posted September 17, 2014 Report Share Posted September 17, 2014 Corvette bodies fit together properly and were deliverd on time? ☺ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunslinger Posted September 17, 2014 Report Share Posted September 17, 2014 MFG didn't assemble the Corvette bodies...they made the panels and shipped them to the St. Louis GM assembly plant for assembly. The Avanti was the first auto body they made the panels for and assembled as complete bodies. That lack of experience in assembly was the root cause of the body fit and delivery problems. Car magazine reviews of the time remarked that the Avanti body seemed thicker than Corvette bodies. At least one magazine reviewer stated the Avanti body was free of ripples compared to Corvette bodies. How accurate that statement was is open to interpretation but magazine writers probably received cars that were gone over pretty well compared to production cars (when production actually ramped up). Writers also wrecked several cars as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfg Posted September 17, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2014 All great comments!....What I had as a major difference, to add to the above, is the fact that the Corvette had a lot more steel under all that fiberglass...For example, the large Avanti doors were completely made of fiberglass....while the same era Corvette door had the fiberglass applied over what was basically a steel skeleton. Recently I was the go-between on a '64 Corvette Roadster door shell....tiny little thing...but it felt like it weighed as much or more than a much larger Studebaker Avanti door shell weighs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now